The first feature is "intuitive destruction". In fact, Battlefield 1 returns to what was in Bad Company 2: Any building on the map can be cut with the ground, which, in turn, is covered with deep funnels from powerful explosions. This gives the game process an additional depth. Just like "dynamic weather". During the match, the element behaves unpredictably: the battle can begin on a sunny day, continue in the pouring rain and end in a thick fog. Depending on the environment, you will have to adjust your tactics.
The next novelty is the “operation” mode, along which you have to take part in several related battles. The results of each battle are transferred to another map, and all scenarios are based on the battles of the First World War.
The attacking team should capture the sector over and over again, and the defenders try to hold the territory. If it does not work, the front line moves to another card.
At the same time, the defenders have powerful support – the so -called giants, huge controlled machines that can turn the course of battle. Armored train, Zeppelin and battleship – a good help.
"Battlefield 1 – This is an attempt to create the most dynamic shooter. We wanted every battle to become a unique event for the player. And in the “Operation” mode, we give people a wide selection of game styles and the opportunity to show a creative approach, – tells Alexander Grandal, Senior producer Dice. – In addition, new giants appeared, and now only in Battlefield 1 You can enter a aircraft into battle".
Personally evaluate all innovations Battlefield 1 It will be possible this summer within the framework of open beta testing. The shooter will be released on October 21 of this year on PC, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.
June 13, 2016 New gameplay trailer Battlefield https://videoslots-casino.co.uk/mobile-app/ 1
June 13, 2016 Boring future Star Wars and Electronic Arts
Battlefield 1
The best comments
I am almost sure that the game will turn out to be cool, the main thing is that the start is, not the same as it has been adopted recently by AAA projects.
I would even say that the start was not the same as it is accepted by the Battlefield series lately. That 4, that 3 and BED are company 2 (to a lesser extent) at the start very limited in terms of network code, bugs and balance. Let’s hope that this time they will take into account the mistakes of the past.
No, one player received the title and could control through a tactical card by his flight, slow tedious, but flight. Titan moved on the map.
I absolutely agree. After all, the Battlefield franchise was always built on realistic facts. The well-known Russian-American war from the BF3, the America-Chinese-Russian conflict from the BF4. And how did they convey all the facts of the war of 2142, just thoroughly!)) Need a story – read books. They seem to be written for this. In the meantime, I will play games))
In fact, except for the setting, nothing new. The dynamics are the same as in BF4. There is no flush of nichrome, just run and fragments to fill with the most speedy weapons and now you are already in the first place. There are too many techniques (most likely it will be imboe, t.To. it will be possible to re -do not get out of the technique). There are many weapons but some of them will directly dominate the other (dates cannot be in balance). But the cards more or less became similar to the Bad Company 2, where there are many destroyed objects.
In fact, we are fed the same. No global development of the gaples of multiplayer shooters, as Battlefield 2 at one time. All the same Call of Duty for large kartav of 64 people. Everyone has already forgotten that the Battlefield series, although it was not a realistic simulator, but a good command-tactical shooter with a scale. But who is the case before that when the airship explodes.
After Verden, aimed shooting from the machine gun standing, a convenient sniper sight and running along the casing of the airship do not look very pleasant, but hell, how do you want to forget about logic and just play.
So I said from the very beginning that there would be no atmosphere of the First World War.And he was right.We are offered the dynamics of previous games due to the universal weapons with automatic machines, machine guns and the rifles, scoring that 95% of the infantrymen were armed with conventional rifles.Fucking here even C4 remained in the form of dynamite. But when they reach WW2 there will be fire.
You described yourself? My condolences.Find the girl, maybe let go.
I expressed my opinion. About the fact that we are sold one and the same with different models over and over again, scoring even on the era of action.
Here you are confirming your moronism over and over again.Where I demand something? You, learn to read and then go into the dispute.
Yes, you are finished, in games the meaning of life you are looking for)) normal people just play them. Game! No one is obliged to do to you believably, no one is obliged to do it reliably to the smallest detail. Dates authors and this is just their entertainment product. No more. They will put them on this under a hundred millions of dollars, millions of players will get high, and you will sit and whine, they say not everything was so and on the shit on the forums. And the news: what ditsam, what to those who Kaifanet is a bolt on you. And who is after that poorly? : D